The Law of Vibration, like the Law of Attraction, has been present since time began, if it ever did.
Shamans and mystics going back until the dawn of human history have known about them.
Now science is starting to pluck the strings.
'Serious' scientists, of course, don't believe a word of all this nonsense.
They're terrified of being attached in any way at all to what they consider 'magic.
' This does not go for the brilliant theoretical physicists.
They speak quite openly of parallel universes, the string theory, the eleven dimensions and like topics.
The scientists and physicists on the cutting edge of discovery are also coming up with the idea of a sort of 'dark' physics; branches of science and mathematics that are quite unknown to us at the moment.
This is where it becomes really fascinating.
For a long time now, people have been speculating about alternate realities, whether we are whom we think we are, or perhaps figments of each others imaginations.
I read a report from one scientist who stated without any doubt that we are completely different people now than we were as children.
The basic premise was that all our atoms have changed, so therefore we must be different.
So much is going on in the fields of physics, and science generally, that I certainly wouldn't disagree with him.
But the string theory is particularly apt with respect to the Law of Vibration.
The current thinking is that when we talk about quarks, electrons, protons, etc.
, we're really speaking about different forms of vibrations on tiny loops of string.
So is this the Law of Vibration in a nutshell or does it work in a totally different manner? Certainly, it works alongside the Law of Attraction, but so far no-one's bothered too much about how it works.
Scientists have dismissed the theory out of hand, while believers knew it worked and therefore never questioned it.
The string theory has its detractors, of course it does.
The main criticism levelled against it is that it's untestable.
This is just the same criticism they level at the Laws of Attraction and Vibration.
They're untestable.
But they're not, as we know.
Anyone can test them by putting them into practice.
That's all you have to do.
The problem as I see it, though, is that even were a person of science to test the Laws of Attraction and Vibration on themselves and they worked, would they dare write about it, admitting to what had happened? As I mentioned in the beginning, science has a horror of being associated with anything that works, but that can't be proved by physics nor mathematics.
By agreeing with the Law of Vibration, they'd be moving into the unknown.
The unprovable.
The magical?
Shamans and mystics going back until the dawn of human history have known about them.
Now science is starting to pluck the strings.
'Serious' scientists, of course, don't believe a word of all this nonsense.
They're terrified of being attached in any way at all to what they consider 'magic.
' This does not go for the brilliant theoretical physicists.
They speak quite openly of parallel universes, the string theory, the eleven dimensions and like topics.
The scientists and physicists on the cutting edge of discovery are also coming up with the idea of a sort of 'dark' physics; branches of science and mathematics that are quite unknown to us at the moment.
This is where it becomes really fascinating.
For a long time now, people have been speculating about alternate realities, whether we are whom we think we are, or perhaps figments of each others imaginations.
I read a report from one scientist who stated without any doubt that we are completely different people now than we were as children.
The basic premise was that all our atoms have changed, so therefore we must be different.
So much is going on in the fields of physics, and science generally, that I certainly wouldn't disagree with him.
But the string theory is particularly apt with respect to the Law of Vibration.
The current thinking is that when we talk about quarks, electrons, protons, etc.
, we're really speaking about different forms of vibrations on tiny loops of string.
So is this the Law of Vibration in a nutshell or does it work in a totally different manner? Certainly, it works alongside the Law of Attraction, but so far no-one's bothered too much about how it works.
Scientists have dismissed the theory out of hand, while believers knew it worked and therefore never questioned it.
The string theory has its detractors, of course it does.
The main criticism levelled against it is that it's untestable.
This is just the same criticism they level at the Laws of Attraction and Vibration.
They're untestable.
But they're not, as we know.
Anyone can test them by putting them into practice.
That's all you have to do.
The problem as I see it, though, is that even were a person of science to test the Laws of Attraction and Vibration on themselves and they worked, would they dare write about it, admitting to what had happened? As I mentioned in the beginning, science has a horror of being associated with anything that works, but that can't be proved by physics nor mathematics.
By agreeing with the Law of Vibration, they'd be moving into the unknown.
The unprovable.
The magical?
SHARE