In many regards I feel sorry for the global warming alarmists.
They've worked so hard to modify the data, and try to lead us in their direction, as they gather the minds of the masses through the media brainwashing and twisting the populous focus to force their agenda.
Of course, they can only hide the data or manipulate the hockey stick so much before someone who stands up with a PhD in the back room says; "Hey wait a minute the person giving a lecture may have a Nobel Prize, but he isn't wearing any clothes today my dear Sir.
" Okay so, let's talk about this for second shall we? In the very near future we will have artificial intelligent programs hooked up to all the real data, or the best data we have, and they will be able to spit out answers, and the truth.
It will be very hard for any competing environmentalist to try to convince us otherwise, but I guarantee they will try anyway.
Of course, maybe they will just use the mass media propaganda machine to yell louder than the scientific community, who is getting bored with this little project.
Indeed, we already see this happening with things like wind turbines, which turned out to be unreliable and very expensive power even when pitted against the most costly of energy generation methods.
And even if we allow the environmentalists to figure in all their proclaimed health care costs associated with air pollution, wind power still doesn't work or perform on an efficient cost per kilowatt hour.
If we have supercomputers in place of all these environmental researchers, then where will they get their funding, and how will they stay in business? Further, why do we need them, and why do they need an army of followers from the masses? Well the reality is they won't need the masses in the future if the global warming researchers are really are interested in the truth.
However if they are going to continue the falsehood of AGW theory and continue to promote their agenda, then they will need all those people on their side.
Because then they will have to convince the public that the artificial intelligent computers are wrong.
In fact it was interesting that they were screwing around with some of the formulas for previous environmental computers, including supercomputers handling weather prediction to promote their global warming.
When they put in all the false equations, the supercomputers could no longer predict the weather at all.
So they had to be recalibrated and set back to what they were, but then they showed that the global warming alarmists were incorrect on their assessments.
I think in the future we are going to find something similar, and it will be almost impossible for these folks to continue forcing that AGW theory down our throats.
Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.
They've worked so hard to modify the data, and try to lead us in their direction, as they gather the minds of the masses through the media brainwashing and twisting the populous focus to force their agenda.
Of course, they can only hide the data or manipulate the hockey stick so much before someone who stands up with a PhD in the back room says; "Hey wait a minute the person giving a lecture may have a Nobel Prize, but he isn't wearing any clothes today my dear Sir.
" Okay so, let's talk about this for second shall we? In the very near future we will have artificial intelligent programs hooked up to all the real data, or the best data we have, and they will be able to spit out answers, and the truth.
It will be very hard for any competing environmentalist to try to convince us otherwise, but I guarantee they will try anyway.
Of course, maybe they will just use the mass media propaganda machine to yell louder than the scientific community, who is getting bored with this little project.
Indeed, we already see this happening with things like wind turbines, which turned out to be unreliable and very expensive power even when pitted against the most costly of energy generation methods.
And even if we allow the environmentalists to figure in all their proclaimed health care costs associated with air pollution, wind power still doesn't work or perform on an efficient cost per kilowatt hour.
If we have supercomputers in place of all these environmental researchers, then where will they get their funding, and how will they stay in business? Further, why do we need them, and why do they need an army of followers from the masses? Well the reality is they won't need the masses in the future if the global warming researchers are really are interested in the truth.
However if they are going to continue the falsehood of AGW theory and continue to promote their agenda, then they will need all those people on their side.
Because then they will have to convince the public that the artificial intelligent computers are wrong.
In fact it was interesting that they were screwing around with some of the formulas for previous environmental computers, including supercomputers handling weather prediction to promote their global warming.
When they put in all the false equations, the supercomputers could no longer predict the weather at all.
So they had to be recalibrated and set back to what they were, but then they showed that the global warming alarmists were incorrect on their assessments.
I think in the future we are going to find something similar, and it will be almost impossible for these folks to continue forcing that AGW theory down our throats.
Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.
SHARE
