Health & Medical Cancer & Oncology

Lung Cancer Screening: Common Ground and Differences

Lung Cancer Screening: Common Ground and Differences

Stepping Stones to Adoption of LDCT as a Screening Tool


LDCT refers to using 10–30% of the total radiation dose used in a standard non contrast CT scan. NLST used multi-detector CT scanners with an average estimated effective dose of 1.5 mSv average as compared to 5–7 mSv for standard CT. There has been a significant debate over adoption of LDCT as a screening tool. One of the major concerns is the risk of radiation induced cancer arising from LDCT itself and from subsequent imaging to work up the positive results. Regarding this issue, there was an important study that suggested that the risk of medical radiation exposure is considerably lower than the benefit of screening. Using the BEIR VII risk estimates, in an hypothetical screening scenario for an individual undergoing annual LDCT examination from age 55 to 74, the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of lung cancer mortality resulting from radiation exposure is estimated to be 0.07% for males and 0.14% for females. To put this information in context, radiation exposure from natural and manmade sources can reach as high as 6.2 mSv per year and airline crew members are exposed to radiation levels as high as 2–6 mSv per year.

Since NLST, there have been continued improvements in LDCT technology and virtually all CT scanners in the United States can obtain LDCT scans at the doses used in the NLST or even lower. Ultra low dose CT scanners (ULDCT) techniques have been developed which deliver excellent images with less than 1 mSv exposure, which is comparable to radiation exposure by CXR. The efficacy of ULDCT was assessed in a study of 52 patients against traditional LDCT. ULDCT was found to have a true positive factor of 0.944 for nodules >4 mm in size, which is the current cut-off for reporting a positive result in screening cohort. Hence, with the continued technological advancements we can hope to achieve the same diagnostic accuracy with the least possible radiation exposure. These studies have been conducted in a population with normal BMI and the data needs to be extrapolated and validated in patients with higher BMIs as they comprise approximately more than one-third of current population of the USA.

SHARE
RELATED POSTS on "Health & Medical"
Greed Is Good? Cigars and Throat Cancer
Greed Is Good? Cigars and Throat Cancer
Top 7 Breast Cancer Sites
Top 7 Breast Cancer Sites
Newer Breast Cancer Drugs Aid Survival
Newer Breast Cancer Drugs Aid Survival
Mammograms Spot Cancers That May Not Be Dangerous
Mammograms Spot Cancers That May Not Be Dangerous
Aging, Frailty, and Chemotherapy
Aging, Frailty, and Chemotherapy
Pediatric Supportive Care (PDQ®): Supportive care - Patient Information [NCI]-Overview
Pediatric Supportive Care (PDQ®): Supportive care - Patient Information [NCI]-Overview
Information About Breast Cancer Treatment
Information About Breast Cancer Treatment
Many Consumers Don't Understand Sunscreen Labels, Study Finds
Many Consumers Don't Understand Sunscreen Labels, Study Finds
pictures of skin cancer
pictures of skin cancer
CML Treatment and Clinical Trials
CML Treatment and Clinical Trials
How to Diagnose Malignant Melanoma
How to Diagnose Malignant Melanoma
Management of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Management of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Symptoms of Skin Cancer
Symptoms of Skin Cancer
Red Wine Antioxidant Fights Cancer
Red Wine Antioxidant Fights Cancer
How Effectively Combination Chemotherapy Works?
How Effectively Combination Chemotherapy Works?
Colon Cancer is Preventable - Don't Die From This Disease!
Colon Cancer is Preventable - Don't Die From This Disease!
Colon Health Check - Self Test For Early Colon Cancer Detection
Colon Health Check - Self Test For Early Colon Cancer Detection
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy
Brain Cancer and Gliomas
Brain Cancer and Gliomas
Sheryl Crow's Battle with Breast Cancer
Sheryl Crow's Battle with Breast Cancer

Leave Your Reply

*